Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
The Daily Cardinal Est. 1892
Sunday, December 22, 2024
Protasiewicz 2023-04-04-4.jpg
Janet Protasiewicz hugs a supporter at her Wisconsin Supreme Court election watch party on April 4, 2023.

Janet Protasiewicz declines to recuse herself from redistricting cases

Protasiewicz argues that there is no precedent in place that requires a justice to recuse themselves from cases for expressing views on political matters or receiving political contributions.

Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Janet Protasiewicz declined to recuse herself from two redistricting lawsuits on Friday after calling the state’s current Republican-drawn electoral district maps “rigged.” 

Protasiewicz emphasized that calling the maps “rigged” was not an actual pledge of her goal in future cases.

“I tell you what my values are because I think the Supreme Court candidates should share with the community and the electorate what their values are,” Protasiewicz said in her statement

Protasiewicz argued against Republicans’ claims by saying there is no precedent for a Wisconsin judge to recuse themselves solely because a political party contributed to their campaign.

Protasiewicz referenced the U.S Supreme Court’s decision to strike down a Minnesota rule that prohibited judicial candidates from announcing their positions on legal or political topics. 

Her decision upholds the court’s 4-3 liberal majority on the redistricting cases but invites the possibility of an impeachment case against her. 

Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos of Rochester has discussed impeachment in an August interview, telling WSAU-AM “you cannot have a person who runs for the court prejudging a case and being open about it”. 

Republican lawmakers have told Protasiewicz to recuse herself from redistricting cases or face impeachment, pointing out the $10 million she received from the Democratic Party of Wisconsin. During her election campaign, Protasiewicz told the Cap Times she would recuse herself from cases brought forward by the Democratic Party.

Neither lawsuits challenging the maps were introduced by the Democratic Party. 

Protasiewicz referenced the U.S Supreme Court’s decision to struck down a Minnesota rule that prohibited judicial candidates from announcing their positions on legal or political topics. 

Vos did not immediately comment on Protasiewicz’s decision. 

Enjoy what you're reading? Get content from The Daily Cardinal delivered to your inbox
Support your local paper
Donate Today
The Daily Cardinal has been covering the University and Madison community since 1892. Please consider giving today.

Ava Menkes

Ava Menkes is the managing editor at The Daily Cardinal. She previously served as the state news editor. She has covered multiple stories about the upcoming election, healthcare and campus, and written in-depth about rural issues, legislative maps and youth voter turnout. She will be an incoming intern with Wisconsin Watch. Follow her on Twitter at @AvaMenkes.


Powered by SNworks Solutions by The State News
All Content © 2024 The Daily Cardinal