Jill Underly, Wisconsin’s state superintendent, recently unveiled a budget proposal that could make a significant difference for public education in Wisconsin.
The proposal, totaling over $3 billion in new funding, aims to address funding gaps that have limited school resources for students, teachers and communities. Underly’s plan, which prioritizes special education, per-student funding increases, property tax relief and grants, is a substantial and badly needed investment in the future of Wisconsin.
This proposal represents a chance to build a stronger public education system that will keep pace with rising costs. Underly's plan ties funding increases to inflation, making it easier for schools to maintain quality education without needing local tax increases or frequent referendums to cover basic expenses. By offering state-level support, this proposal will relieve financial pressure on local communities, making funding for education more stable and reliable. It will also advance equitable and inclusive education by significantly increasing special education funding, which would help schools meet state mandates while supporting students with disabilities.
For students, these changes would mean better access to essential resources, especially for those in special education programs and low-income households. The proposed increase in the special education reimbursement rate — from 32% to 90% over three years — would provide much-needed funding to cover costs for critical services. This increase would allow districts to offer better support to students with disabilities, enhancing their educational experience and opportunities. The rise in per-student funding would mean schools can improve or maintain essential services, technology, classroom resources and educational programs that benefit all students.
Families would also feel the positive effects of this plan. By capping property tax increases to an average of 1.5% over the next two years, Underly’s proposal would help control local tax rates while ensuring that schools still receive necessary funding. For families in low-income brackets, additional financial support for their children in schools through per-student aid increases and the extra 20% in funding for students in poverty would help reduce inequities and offer better educational opportunities. Programs funded through the Out-of-School-Time Grant, aimed at reducing chronic absenteeism, would provide added support to keep students engaged, which is particularly helpful for working families who rely on after-school programs.
While Underly's proposal seems promising, some critics argue the increase in state-level funding could shift too much responsibility away from local communities. They argue that local school districts should have more control over their budgets and how money is allocated, rather than relying heavily on state-imposed funding structures. Additionally, some have raised concerns the plan's reliance on capping property taxes may not be sustainable in the long run, potentially leading to future budget deficits or the need for future tax increases to balance the books. While the proposal aims to provide more equitable education, the overall economic feasibility of funding such initiatives without raising taxes in the future remains a contentious issue.
However, Underly’s proposal could lead to long-term benefits for Wisconsin’s educational system that outweigh these concerns. With sustainable funding, better resources for students and more financial support for families, the state can work toward creating a more equitable, well-resourced and inclusive education system.
This investment in education is an investment in Wisconsin’s future workforce and community, helping ensure that all students have the opportunity to thrive and succeed.
Maya Morvis is a sophomore studying Journalism and Political Science. Do you agree that State Superintendent Jill Underly’s budget proposal is good for Wisconsin schools? Send all comments to opinion@dailycardinal.com.
